Legal Opinion

Brady v. . Brady

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action is to recover $900 in the possession of the defendant Bridger.

The plaintiff alleges, in substance, that he is the owner of a tract of land in Virginia; that the defendant R. B. Brady has sold the timber on said land, and has caused the same to be cut and removed; that $900 of the money paid for the timber is now in the possession of the defendant Bridger, as attorney for the defendant Brady, and that he has made demand for said money, which has been refused.

There is no allegation of an unlawful entry upon said land, nor that the cutting and removal was wrongful, and the plaintiff…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Stokes v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Halleck v. MixerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Mooers v. WaitNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  5. Tyson v. McGuineasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Howle v. Twin States Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Montesano Lum. & Mfg. Co. v. Portland Iron WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Blevens v. Kitchin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Gibbs v. HeavlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API