Legal Opinion

Saginaw Milling Co. v. Schram

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1915No. Docket No. 12PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Sanilac; Beach, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the Saginaw Milling Company against John Schram for breach of a contract of sale. Judgment for defendant for an alleged recoupment. Plaintiff appealed to the circuit court which directed a verdict in its favor. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This case was begun in a justice’s court of Sanilac county, where judgment was rendered in favor of defendant under his claim of recoupment for $225.86, from which plaintiff appealed to the circuit court of said county where, on retrial by jury, a judgment was rendered in its favor on a directed verdict for $105.85, and defendant in turn has now removed the case to this court by writ of error with many assignments, which all condense to the question of whether the trial court erroneously excluded a line of testimony on which defendant relied, and without which he could not prevail. If the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ledyard v. HibbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Fish v. Crawford Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Julius Hermann & Co. v. People's Department StoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Muir v. Leonard Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McDonald v. Union Hay Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Chaney v. Lake Drive GarageMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Goldman v. Great Lakes Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Saginaw Milling Co. v. SchramMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API