Legal Opinion

Ledyard v. Hibbard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1882PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to' Kent. Replevin. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Replevin for a quantity of wheat. The following facts were developed on the trial:

The fi.m of Hibbard & Graff, composed of Wellington Hibbard and Peter Graff, Jr., were merchant millers in Grand Rapids, owning and operating two mills, known respectively as the Orescent and the Yalley City. With each mill was an elevator in which they stored wheat for their own pur*423poses, and also received and stored for fanners and others. Plaintiff, from time to time, from March, 1878, to March, 1880, delivered to them wheat which they received into their elevators. The manner of doing the business was as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Walls v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Boorman v. JenkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  3. Harris v. . TumbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Ober v. Carson'sSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Thwing v. Great Western InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Rice v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Rotterman v. General Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. Schindler v. WestoverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Durant Construction, Inc v. GourleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API