Legal Opinion

United States v. Moulton & Powell Moulton & Powell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1951No. 12563_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

Following the decision of this court in United States v. Priest Rapids Irr. Dist., 9 Cir., 175 F.2d 524, and pursuant to the mandate, the district court entered a modified judgment in that condemnation proceeding. The sum fixed in the judgment represented the balance of the compensation awarded. The judgment provided: “It is Further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that said deficiency judgment of $302,856.-00, together with interest as above ordered, and the whole thereof, shall be paid into this Court and remain subject to the orders of this Court until such time as this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Grogan v. Valley Trading Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. May v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jules E. Angoff v. Bernard Goldfine, Harold Brown v. Bernard GoldfineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  2. King County v. Seawest Investment Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. King County v. SEAWEST INV. ASSOCIATES, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Bailey v. Meister Brau, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  5. Mardel Securities, Inc. v. Alexandria Gazette Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API