Slater v. State

We have set out the evidence somewhat in detail. We do this for the reason that the only contention on behalf of the defendant is that the evidence does not authorize the verdict of attempt to rob. Several cases are cited by counsel for the defendant to sustain this contention. The State likewise cites a number of cases to sustain the contrary view that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. Hence, the question before us for decision is *289not so much what the law is, but whether the facts above related should cast our decision for a reversal or for an affirmance of the judgment. We…