Legal Opinion
Messina v. East Penn Township
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 17, 2012PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
Appellants, Charles and Agnes Messina, and Lehigh Asphalt Paving and Construction Company, appeal from the Commonwealth Court’s affirmation of the order of the Carbon County Court of Common Pleas, which held appellants’ challenge to *366East Penn Township Zoning Ordinance No.1996-94 was time-barred. We affirm.
Charles and Agnes Messina own 114.4 acres in East Penn Township, Carbon County, where- they reside in a single-family residence. Lehigh Asphalt Paving and Construction Company is the equitable owner of the property pursuant to an option contract, and it uses a portion of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re Condemnation by Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Glen-Gery Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Schadler v. Zoning Hearing Board of Weisenberg TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Cranberry Park Associates v. Cranberry Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. UPMC, Appeal of: UPMCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- McLaughlin v. Forty Fort BoroughDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Ness v. York Township Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Shaw v. Township of Upper St. Clair Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.