Legal Opinion

Schadler v. Zoning Hearing Board of Weisenberg Township

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 2004No. 222 MAP 2003PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NIGRO.

We granted allowance of appeal in this zoning case to determine whether the Commonwealth Court erred in finding that a challenge to the validity of a zoning ordinance based on procedural defects in the ordinance’s enactment was time-barred because it was filed more than thirty days after the ordinance’s nominal effective date. For the following reasons, we hold that the court did err and we therefore reverse.

Appellant Timothy J. Schadler is the owner of approximately 41 acres of land in a rural-residential zoning district in Weisenberg Township, Lehigh County (the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Gwynedd Properties, Inc. v. Lower Gwynedd Township, Catherine M. Harper, Edward J. Brandt, Janet H. Kirch, Richard Landis, and Robert McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. AshenfelderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Cranberry Park Associates v. Cranberry Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Lower Gwynedd Township v. Gwynedd Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Edwards v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Appeal of McGlynnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Glen-Gery Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Luke v. CataldiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Seitel Data, Ltd. v. Center TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API