Kerling v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action by the administrator of- the estate of Andrew Kerling in the district court for Yellow Medicine county to recover $5,000 for his wrongful death. The case was tried before Powers, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $4,500. From an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, it appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
This action by the plaintiff to recover damages for the death of his minor son was before this court in Kerling v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co., 108 Minn. 51, 121 N. W. 221. The manner of the accident *483and the description of the machinery, xhe claimed unguarded condition of which constitutes the alleged negligence of the defendant, were fully stated in the decision then rendered, as was the conclusion of this court that the liability of the defendant was a question for the jury.
The mandate directing a new trial was issued June 4, and filed in the office of the clerk of the district court June 7,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gunderson v. Northwestern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Callopy v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Kincaid v. JungkunzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Bremer v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Calderwood v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- United States v. BergamoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Krahn v. J. L. Owens Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- In Re Estate of JanecekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Christensen v. PestoriousSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.