Legal Opinion
United States v. Bergamo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 20, 1946No. 9002PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The defendants were convicted of knowingly possessing with the intent to -utter and publish as true counterfeit gasoline and counterfeit sugar ration stamps in violation of Section 28 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 72. They have appealed. Various grounds for reversal of the judgments of conviction are asserted by the defendants. These, save one, are so lacking in merit as to require no extended discussion. The remaining ground, however, is such as to require a new trial. The pertinent facts follow.
The defendants were residents of Newark, New Jersey. It was alleged…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- People v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Roy Wilson v. Barry MintzesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Cooper v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. Handy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- State v. DemastusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.