Commonwealth v. Jorgenson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
In this case, appellant, arguing that he was denied his constitutional right to cross-examine and confront his accuser, requests discharge or a new trial. He also argues the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction for simple assault, and that the procedures used in charging him were faulty. After carefully considering the opinion of the lower court, the pertinent statutes, and the public policies at stake, we affirm the judgment of sentence.
The facts of this case are not pleasant. On September 28, 1981, state police' arrested appellant and charged him with rape,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MajoranaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. VeneriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. StrubeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MartiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. OginSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In the Interest of M.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.