Legal Opinion

Gilkerson v. Coffey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1915No. 4836Published

Appeal from County Court, Woodward County; Clyde H. Wyand, Judge. Action by E. E. Coffey and others against C. S. Gil-kerson. From the judgment, Gilkerson brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CEOW, C.

Plaintiff in error has failed to assign as error the overruling of his motion for new trial by the trial court. All the assignments of error contained in his petition in error are such as would require a review of the record in the case to discover errors alleged to have occurred during the progress of the trial, in the lower court. “It is a well-established rule in this court that, where the plaintiff in error fails to assign as error the overruling of a motion for a new trial in his petition in error, no question is properly presented in the Supreme Court to review errors…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. LavineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. McDonald v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Bice v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API