Legal Opinion

Haley v. Cockrell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 27, 2002No. 01-41389PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:

The respondent appeals from the district court’s grant of habeas corpus in favor of the defendant, Michael Wayne Haley (“Haley”). Finding no error, we affirm. The only issue before us is whether the district court properly granted habeas relief to Haley for his insufficiency-of-the-evidence claim. Thus, we recite only those facts pertinent to our decision.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Haley, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, proceeding pro se, filed a federal application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Dretke v. HaleySupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Busby v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Cotton v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Michael Anthony Taylor v. Michael S. BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Gibbs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API