Legal Opinion

Dretke v. Haley

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 3, 2004No. 02-1824PublishedCited by 721 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Out of respect for finality, comity, and the orderly administration of justice, a federal court will not entertain a procedurally defaulted constitutional claim in a petition for habeas corpus absent a showing of cause and prejudice to excuse the default. We have recognized a narrow exception to the general rule when the habeas applicant can demonstrate that the alleged constitutional error has resulted in the conviction of one who is actually innocent of the underlying offense or, in the capital sentencing context, of the aggravating circumstances rendering the inmate eligible for the death…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by721 opinions

  1. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Davila v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Maples v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Shinn v. Martinez RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  5. Harbison v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

716 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API