Legal Opinion
Sienkiewicz v. Sienkiewicz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 28, 1979PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The plaintiff filed an application for execution against the defendant’s pension benefits to satisfy a court order for outstanding alimony and child support payments. The trial court determined that the defendant’s pension benefits were a debt accruing by reason of personal services, and hence subject to execution, but limited the amount of the order to that provided in General Statutes § 52-361. *677The plaintiff has appealed, arguing that the applicable execution statute is not § 52-361 but rather § 52-362.
The facts found by the trial court indicate the following: the plaintiff, Helen…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. MerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Brown, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Gray v. QuintilianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- New Haven Savings Bank v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Leach v. FlorkoskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- General Tires, Inc. v. United Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
3Cited by15 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Warren v. Taff (In Re Taff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
- Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Vernon Village, Inc. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.