Century Indemnity Co. v. Aero-Motive Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
This case involves an insurance dispute regarding coverage for environmental damage. The insurers, Century Indemnity Company (“Century”) and One Beacon Insurance Company (“One Beacon”) filed this action seeking a declaration that they are not obligated to Defendants (collectively “Aero”) under certain policies that they issued and that they are not obligated to satisfy a consent judgment among Defendants. Continental Insurance (“Continental”) was subsequently permitted to intervene as a plaintiff. Now before the Court are Aero’s motion for partial summary judgment…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jawad a Shah Md Pc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Fluor Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- Elliott Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Alticor, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.