Legal Opinion

Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 27, 2018No. A–21 September Term 2016; 078152PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA

*304**33This appeal involves questions about the insurance coverage available to defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (Honeywell), a New Jersey based corporation, for thousands of bodily-injury claims premised on exposure to brake and clutch pads (friction products) containing asbestos. We granted certification to address **34two issues. First, we consider whether the law of New Jersey or Michigan (the headquarters location of Honeywell's predecessor when the disputed excess insurance policies were issued) should control in the allocation of insurance liability among insurers for nationwide…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. PV Ex Rel. TV v. Camp JayceeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  3. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  2. DAVID F. CALABOTTA VS. PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION (L-1979-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  3. In re Ambassador Insurance Company (Bestwall LLC, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  4. ANTHONY CELESTIN VS. AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. (L-0102-19, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  5. BERGEN BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTORS LLC v. EASTERN DISTRIBUTORS 1, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API