Legal Opinion
Gundry v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1930No. Docket No. 95PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment based upon the verdict of a jury and from an order denying a new trial.
The action arose out of a collision between a locomotive operated by the defendant and a truck and trailer operated by one McCormac; who was driving the same for the plaintiffs. The collision occurred in the city of Bakersfield on October 31, 1926. Plaintiffs alleged negligence in the following language:
“That at said time and place, as aforesaid, the defendants did negligently, carelessly, and without due regard for the safety of others, operate, propel, and drive an engine into, and so as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brautigam v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Curtis v. KastnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Mahnkey v. BolgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.