Legal Opinion
NATIONAL SECURITY FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. Maurice DeWITT
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 18, 2011No. 1091225PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WISE, Justice.
The remaining defendant below, National Security Fire & Casualty Company (“National Security”), appeals an order of the Mobile Circuit Court certifying a class action.
Facts and Procedural History
The plaintiff, Maurice DeWitt, lived in a mobile home in Theodore. On August 29, 2005, DeWitt’s mobile home and storage shed were damaged during Hurricane Katrina. At the time of the loss, DeWitt had a homeowner’s insurance policy with National Security, and DeWitt filed a claim with National Security regarding the loss. Subsequently, an insurance adjuster with National Security went to…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Smilow v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Mills v. Foremost InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McKinnie v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Peterson Produce, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019