Legal Opinion
National Union Fire Insurance v. Mason, Perrin & Kanovsky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 17, 1989No. 87 Civ. 9269 (RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Helen R. Kanovsky (“Kanovsky”) has moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(7), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (“National Union”) on the grounds that National Union failed to join indispensable parties under Rule 19, Fed.R.Civ.P., and for attorney’s fees incurred in defending against the complaint. In the alternative, Kanovsky has moved under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer this matter to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Kanovsky is joined in this motion by…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McNeill v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Holland v. Fahnestock & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Austin v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters-Airline Division 2747District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Kunz v. New York State Commission on Judicial ConductDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Namrod Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.