Legal Opinion
Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Horner
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1998No. Civil 980030PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert Horner, Sally Horner and Brian Horner appealed a summary judgment declaring Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Ohio) has no duty to defend or indemnify the Horners in any action brought against them by Laurie Fay for damages incurred from being struck by a slingshot on April 14, 1995. We conclude there are no genuine issues of material fact Brian Horner’s slingshot shooting of Fay was an intentional act for which insurance coverage is excluded. We therefore affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Ohio issued a homeowner’s insurance policy to Robert and Sally Horner effective June 17, 1994…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Cermak v. CermakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Sellie v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Diegel v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Narum v. Faxx Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Tibert v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Schneider v. SchaafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Fetch v. QuamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Case Credit Corp. v. Oppegard's, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.