David M. Rice, Inc. v. Intrex, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MacLAUGHLIN, Justice.
Plaintiff, David M. Rice, Inc. (Rice), a Nebraska corporation, commenced an action in a Nebraska state court against defendant, Intrex Incorporated (Intrex), a New York corporation, and obtained a default judgment in the amount of $2,249.60. Subsequently, Rice brought an action on the judgment in Minnesota gaining quasi-in-rem jurisdiction by garnishment. The Hen-nepin County Municipal Court granted Rice’s motion for summary judgment and Intrex appeals, alleging that there was no valid in personam jurisdiction over Intrex in the Nebraska court. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Stucky v. StuckyNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Griffis v. LubanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Howells v. McKibbenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Kreisler Manufacturing Corp. v. Homstad Goldsmith, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Busch v. MannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Donnely v. Copeland Intra Lenses, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.