Exxon Corp. v. Heinze
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Exxon Corporation (“Exxon”)1 appeals an order dismissing its 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit and denying its prayer to enjoin certain Alaska state court litigation over state oil and gas royalties. Exxon contends that the state court litigation violates its due process right to an unbiased forum. Because a partial settlement has substantially changed the posture of the case, and because the factual record is now insufficient to review Exxon’s claims on their merits, we dismiss for lack of ripeness, vacating the district court’s order.
I
In 1977, the State of Alaska filed a state…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stivers v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MikhelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Lowery v. Channel Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Buono v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Cruz v. Aurora Loan Services LLC (In Re Cruz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.