Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sealey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1023Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 12, 2010, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a customer service agent for a commercial airline company for approximately three years when she was discharged for assisting a coworker with the sale of a guest pass for profit, which was against company policy. When claimant sought unemployment insurance benefits, the Department of Labor issued an initial determination disqualifying her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CzosekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re BrauneisenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re the Claim of RothsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of McNeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re the Claim of PortisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re the Claim of PortisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Matter of Lucas (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API