Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Rothstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 26, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Spain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 4, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
After claimant and a coworker had an argument in the workplace, both employees were suspended from their positions with pay pending an employer investigation of the incident. At the conclusion of the investigation, claimant was found to have physically threatened the coworker and was terminated for creating a hostile work environment. Claimant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of HawanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of SealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of MessadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010