Legal Opinion
State v. Walzer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 23, 1986No. 4569PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We find no error.
In August, 1983, the defendant pleaded guilty to the charge of larceny in the first degree by embezzlement in violation of General Statutes § 53a-119 (1) and General Statutes (Rev. to 1981) § 53a-122 (a) (2), as amended by Public Acts 1981, No. 81-248, § 1. In October, 1983, he was sentenced by the court, Melville, J., to a term of six years to run consecutively with an unrelated federal sentence he was then serving. The *366sentence was later affirmed by the sentence review board.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Redway v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Merchant v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- State v. McKaughenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Copeland v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. WalzerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Copeland v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.