Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 5, 1983No. CIV 82-1074-RPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
The Plaintiff, Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) has filed a Motion to Compel, pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order compelling Defendant, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its capacity as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. (the “FDIC”) to produce the documents requested by Plaintiff and answer the Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories to Defendant.
In conjunction with its response to Plaintiff’s motion, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff filed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- John L. Walker Co. v. AldenDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1934
- Converse Rubber Co. v. Boston-Continental Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935
- Converse Rubber Co. v. Boston-Continental Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
3Cited by15 opinions
- K & S Partnership v. Continental Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Hibernia National Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Jarboe v. United States Small Business Administration (In Re Hancock)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1992
- Northern Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
- Northern Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.