Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Bahler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1982No. WCB 79-06095, CA A22838PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Claimant appeals a portion of an order on reconsideration of the Workers’ Compensation Board that failed to award attorney fees after she had prevailed on the issue of compensation in a carrier-initiated appeal. 1 The issue is whether claimant is entitled to an award of a carrier-paid attorney fee when, after a carrier-initiated review, the Board finds that compensation should not be reduced but that penalties awarded by the referee should be reduced.

Claimant worked for Mail-Well for 13 years. In February, 1979, she left its employment. On May 2, 1979, she filed a claim for occupational…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mobley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Reed v. DEL CHEMICAL CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shoulders v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Saxton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Mt. Mazama Plywood Co. v. BeattieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Shoulders v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API