Legal Opinion

Mt. Mazama Plywood Co. v. Beattie

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 1983No. 80-05477; CA A24563PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Employer appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming a referee’s finding that claimant’s back and psychiatric condition are compensable. Claimant cross-appeals, contending that the Board erred in reversing the referee’s award of penalties and in failing to award attorney fees for her successful defense of an employer-initiated appeal before the Board.

After hurting her back pulling veneer at work, claimant was diagnosed as having lumbosacral strain and fibrositis. She later developed functional overlay and depression that she contends are directly related to her physical…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Frasure v. Agripac, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Mobley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Ginter v. Woodburn United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shoulders v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Schuening v. J.R. Simplot & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Saxton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Price v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API