Legal Opinion

Sneed v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1937No. A-9139PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

Plaintiff in error, Otto Sneed, and Tom Fuson were informed against for the defense of larceny of live stock. The information in substance charges that in Marshall county on or about the 29th day of May, 1935, the said defendants did feloniously take, steal, and carry away a cow, the personal property of one Lewis Townsley, with the felonious intent then and there on the part of them to deprive said Lewis Townsley of said livestock, and to convert the same to their own use and benefit.

Upon his separate trial the defendant, Otto Sneed, was found guilty as charged in the information and his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Crowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Underwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Bryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Cope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Traxler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Cawley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. State v. StegallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. McDaniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API