Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. Timm
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Porter Superior Court; Harry L. Crumpacker, Judge. Action by Edward Timm against the Haskell and Barker Car Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.
This is an action against appellant for damages for personal injuries for alleged negligence. A motion to make the complaint more specific was overruled by the trial court, as was a demurrer to the com.plaint. Appellant filed answer in denial. The cause Was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict for *614appellee together with answers to certain interrogatories. A motion by appellant for judgment on the answers to interrogatories notwithstanding the general verdict was overruled, and judgment was rendered for ■appellee. The allegations of the complaint are in substance that at the time of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamilton v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- William Laurie Co. v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. ScribnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Roose v. RooseIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. SampleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Surety Co. v. KinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. MonfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Deep Vein Coal Co. v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Jones v. Princeton Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1923