Legal Opinion

State v. McConville

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 1, 2011No. 0900013CR; A142165PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant, who pleaded guilty to one count of first-degree burglary, ORS 164.225, and two counts of first-degree theft, ORS 164.055 (2007), amended by Or Laws 2009, ch 16, § 3; Or Laws 2009, ch 610, § 6, 1 appeals from the resulting judgments, assigning error to the trial court’s failure to merge the verdicts on the two theft counts into a single conviction under ORS 161.067(3). 2 In a pro se supplemental brief, defendant also raises an additional assignment of error regarding the trial court’s acceptance of his guilty plea; we reject that assignment without discussion. We review the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. BarnumOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. CaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API