Legal Opinion

Oklahoma State Bank of Davis v. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1930No. 18856PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, O.

The Oklahoma State Bank of Davis, as plaintiff, began this action in the district court of Muskogee county, Okla., against the First National Bank of Muskogee and the First State Bank of Vanoss, as defendants, for an accounting of certain funds alleged to have been received by the defendant from the sale of certain mortgaged chattels. Plaintiff alleged that on April 26, 1921, one James Hastings executed and delivered to M. R. Chileutt three promissory notes, one for- $3,000, one for 2,000 and one for $2,416.65; and that said notes were secured by a chattel mortgage on 172 steers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maier v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Cone v. IvinsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Alter v. Bank of StockhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fourth Nat. Bank of Tulsa v. EidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Bank of Jefferson v. First Nat. Bank of MedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Fourth Nat. Bank of Tulsa v. EidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API