Legal Opinion

Fourth Nat. Bank of Tulsa v. Eidson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1947No. 32963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an appeal by defendant Bank from a judgment rendered upon a jury’s verdict in the district court of Tulsa county. It is not urged on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support such verdict and judgment, thus all questions of fact supported by any competent evidence are resolved in favor of plaintiff. Hence, it is unnecessary to set forth a lengthy recitation of the pleadings and the evidence, and the following statement may be considered as the facts of the case as determined by the jury.

Plaintiff was a merchant and rancher residing at Eagle Pass, Tex. Defendant, H. V.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rushing v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Drum Standish Commission Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Babbitt Bros. Trading Co. v. MarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Pollack v. Leonard & BraniffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bank of the Wichitas v. LedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. Kelso v. KelsoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Dudley v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Swan Air Conditioning Co. v. Crest Construction Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Hines v. Superior Court of Okmulgee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API