Legal Opinion

Sorger v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1975No. C.A. 75-2406PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRODERICK, District Judge.

Plaintiff in this case is seeking an injunction which will restrain the defendants from obtaining possession of their property which is located in the Frank lin Town area of the City of Philadelphia. The plaintiff’s property was condemned for redevelopment as part of what is known as the Franklin Town Project and the plaintiff asks this Court to set aside the state condemnation proceeding. The plaintiff alleges three causes of action arising under the United States Constitution and contends that this Court has jurisdiction of these federal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mitchum v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duty Free Shop, Inc. v. Administracion De Terrenos De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Donald W. Pelfresne v. Village of Williams BayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Aristocrat Health Club of Hartford, Inc. v. ChaucerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
  4. Johnson v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Duty Free Shop, Inc. v. Administracion De TerrenosDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API