Bracey Advertising Co. v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRASWELL, Judge.
The facts relate to outdoor advertising signs on interstate highways. The law involves the subject of nonconforming use. The only question presented for review, as phrased by the respondent appellants, is: “Did the trial court err in ruling that as of October 15, 1972, the petitioner’s sign structures were a nonconforming use such that petitioner had a vested right to build the subject outdoor advertising signs?” We find the trial judge ruled correctly.
Over the years Bracey Advertising Company, Inc. (hereafter called Bracey) has conducted its business of outdoor advertising on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Town of Hillsborough v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Application of Campsites Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Warner v. W & O, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Keiger v. Winston-Salem Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Advertising Co. v. Bradshaw, SEC. of Transp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Sanford v. Dandy Signs, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983