Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Szucs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 167, Calendar No. 33,792PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is review of a summary judgment for plaintiff.

In addition to the common counts, plaintiff’s original declaration contained a count on express contract to pay him $1,500 as compensation for his services as defendant’s attorney in a divorce suit which was discontinued before hearing. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment, supported by his own affidavit that such express contract had been made; that the specific sum of $1,500 had been agreed upon; and that $150 had been paid on account. He had summary judgment for $1,350. In opposition to motion to set aside this judgment, plaintiff made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steele v. HammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Howell v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Banco De Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Becht v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. McComsey v. LeafCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Kelly v. LiddicoatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API