Legal Opinion

Emil Perzinski v. Chevron Chemical Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 15, 1974No. 73-1490PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee Emil Perzinski brought this action to recover damages resulting from a reduction in yield of his 1968 potato crop. Perzinski claimed that the damage to his crop was caused by the application of Paraquat, a herbicide distributed by the defendant Chevron Chemical Company. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and Chevron appeals.

Although the issues raised by Chevron are multi-faceted, they are essentially three: (1) whether the district court erred in admitting certain evidence as admissions by Chevron; (2) whether the district court erred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Valiga v. National Food Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Rudzinski v. Warner Theatres, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Larson v. FetherstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Shoemaker v. Marc's Big BoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Gloria Elston v. Larry Morgan and Clarence A. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Zurich American Insurance Company v. Watts IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Allen S. Berman v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Berman v. SchweikerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  5. Pamela Sue Rulo Sadowski v. Bombardier LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API