Legal Opinion
Richard v. Skagen v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 23, 1990No. 89-2801PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Skagen brought this action against Sears, Roebuck and Company (“Sears”), his former employer of twenty-nine years, for wrongful discharge in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”). On appeal, Skagen claims that summary judgment was improper because he had made out a prima facie case of age discrimination and constructive discharge. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Skagen worked for Sears at its Chicago headquarters as the national credit marketing manager until Sears announced a restructuring of its corporate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wilbur L. KEPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INSTITUTE OF GAS TECHNOLOGY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Friedel v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Bell, Boyd & Lloyd v. Jack W. TapyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Eurid MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK of CHICAGO, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
3Cited by67 opinions
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Perkins v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Stewart v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Charles HUGHES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward J. DERWINSKI, Secretary of the Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Shirley Mills v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of BelvidereCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.