Craddock v. Kmart Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Plaintiffs Rebecca Craddock and Ronald Craddock sued defendant Kmart Corporation for personal injury and premises liability arising out of an accident suffered by Rebecca Craddock at a Kmart store. Plaintiff Ronald Craddock, Rebecca’s husband, alleged loss of consortium. (We sometimes refer to the plaintiffs by their first names for clarity.)
After jury trial, plaintiffs won a special verdict. The jury found that Kmart’s negligence was 90 percent responsible for Rebecca’s injuries and that her negligence was 10 percent responsible. The jury awarded Rebecca total damages (without…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Romo v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Independent Roofing Contractors v. California Apprenticeship CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Hard v. CALIFORNIA STATE EMPLOYEES ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.