Legal Opinion
Seo v. Oh
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 10, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2018-0785Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KANG KYU SEO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-cv-785 (RDM) CHARLES MOON SUK OH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On October 6, 2022, a jury returned a verdict in favor of all four Plaintiffs, finding that Charles Moon Suk Oh and Wade Road, Inc. failed to pay Plaintiffs overtime wages as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), the D.C. Wage Payment and Collection Law (“DCWPCL”), and the D.C. Minimum Wage Act (“DCMWA”). Following trial, Plaintiffs requested that the Court enter final judgment…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Austin v. Paramount Parks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Martin T. Kosmynka and Christine Kosmynka v. Polaris Industries, Inc., Docket No. 05-3958-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Breed LogisticsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.