Legal Opinion

Sherman v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 21, 1980No. [No. 29, September Term, 1980.]PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

Murphy, C. J., and Rodowsky, J., dissent. Murphy, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion at page 642 infra, in which Rodowsky, J., concurs.

The appellant, Robert Sherman, a member of the Maryland bar since 1965, was convicted by a jury in the Criminal Court of Baltimore for the unlawful and willful use of his client’s funds in violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol.), Art. 10, Section 44. He argues on appeal that reversible error was committed when, contrary to Maryland Rule 758 a, the presiding judge permitted the jurors to have with them in the jury room during their deliberations the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Hillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Countess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Huffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Merritt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Cox v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API