Legal Opinion

Greenhow v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1985No. 83-730PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

Following a jury trial, appellant Larry Greenhow was convicted of possession of phenmetrazine (Preludin), a controlled substance, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(c) (Supp.1983) (now codified at D.C.Code § 33-541(d) (Supp.1984)). Greenhow appeals on two grounds: first, that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the defense of alibi; and second, that the court impermissibly intruded into the trial when he gave the prosecutor information from the court file that allowed the prosecutor to impeach appellant in regard to statements he had made concerning…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Erlenbaugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. WhitingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. United States v. DyeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. MacK v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Bright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. El-TabechNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API