Legal Opinion
Gunther GRAEFENHAIN and Philip Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PABST BREWING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 26, 1987No. 85-3094, 85-3095PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILL, Senior District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment n.o.v. in a suit brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The plaintiffs, Gunther Graefenhain and Philip Miller, sued Pabst Brewing Co. (“Pabst”) for age dis crimination. 1 The jury found that Pabst had willfully discriminated against both Graefenhain and Miller by terminating them on the basis of age. Following a separate trial for damages, the district court found the jury verdict unsupportable and granted Pabst’s motion for a judgment n.o.v. The questions presented on this appeal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Anthony J. Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Anthony J. ChipolliniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Eleanor H. Montana v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Ron G. McCoy v. Wgn Continental Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Collins v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.