Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Hickman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1969No. 2915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

227 So.2d 14 (1969)

Vergil Dupre HICKMAN, Petitioner in Habeas Corpus Proceeding, Respondent,

v.

Nellie Jo Price HICKMAN, Defendant in Habeas Corpus Proceeding, Relator.

No. 2915.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

September 24, 1969.

Dissenting Opinion October 13, 1969.

Rehearing Denied October 17, 1969.

Ford & Nugent, by Howard N. Nugent, Jr., Alexandria, for defendant-relator.

Gravel, Roy & Burnes, by Richard Burnes, Alexandria, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before TATE, SAVOY, HOOD, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

TATE, Judge.

We granted supervisory writs to assure immediate review of a trial court…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Goetz v. GoetzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. North v. Ringling Ringling v. NorthSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. Panther v. PantherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Farley v. FarleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hickman v. HickmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fountain v. FountainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Mertens v. MertensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Dooley v. DooleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Jordan v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Smith v. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API