Legal Opinion
Budofsky v. Hartford Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1990PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*692OPINION OF THE COURT
Harry Richard Brown, J.
This is a declaratory judgment action in which the plaintiffs seek a declaration that damage to their property caused by the storage and release of toxic substances is covered under their policies with the five insurance carriers named as defendants, and that the insurance companies are obligated to defend and indemnify plaintiffs with respect to claims for damages pertaining to the cleanup and remediation of the premises. Defendant Continental Insurance Company (Continental) has moved for summary judgment asserting that the damages and losses…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ace Wire & Cable Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust v. City of Coon RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Guilford Industries Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Jussim v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Bernhardt v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Vantage Dev. v. American Env. Tech.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.