Legal Opinion

Melvin v. Hamilton, Admr.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1936No. 15,194PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment of the Franklin Circuit Court. The sole error assigned for reversal is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The appellants have failed to set out a copy of their motion for a new trial or the substance thereof in their brief. The brief also fails to show that any time was given in which to file a bill of exceptions containing the evidence and proceedings of the trial court or that any bill of exceptions approved by such court was ever filed and made a part of the record. Thus no question is presented for our consideration. State ex…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Hinds, TrusteeIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Indiana Service Corp. v. Dailey, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. United Paperboard Co. v. Muncie, Etc., Supply Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Plumley v. StanelleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Ross v. CloreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Stirn v. VohlandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. Plumley v. StanelleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API