Plumley v. Stanelle
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P.J.
Plaintiffs-appellants (Plumley) appeal from a negative judgment. Plumley had sought recovery from defendants-appellees (Stanelle) alleging fraud in the sale of business property. Plumley argues that the decision was contrary to the weight of the evidence and contrary to law.
Insofar as Plumley attacks the weight or sufficiency of the evidence, no issue is before us for review. Graves v. City of Muncie (1970), 255 Ind. 360, 264 N.E.2d 607; Booher v. Alhom, Inc. (1973), 156 Ind. App. 192, 295 N.E.2d 841.
*273*272In circumstances before us, we may reverse a judgment as being contrary to law only where…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. SPIDEL ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Muehlman v. KeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Grissom v. MoranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Woodward Insurance, Inc. v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Carrell v. EllingwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- First National Bank of New Castle v. AcraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fleetwood Corp. v. MirichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.