Legal Opinion
Plumley v. Stanelle
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 30, 1974No. 2-473A102Published
1Opinion of the Court
311 N.E.2d 626 (1974)
Dean PLUMLEY and Rose A. Plumley, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Albert L. STANELLE, Sr., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 2-473A102.
Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District.
May 30, 1974.
Kenneth M. Waterman, Parker, Hoover & Roush, Fort Wayne, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Alfred H. Plummer III, Plummer, Tiede, Magley & Metz, Wabash, for defendants-appellees.
SULLIVAN, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants (Plumley) appeal from a negative judgment. Plumley had sought recovery from defendants-appellees (Stanelle) alleging fraud in the sale of business property. Plumley argues that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. SPIDEL ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Muehlman v. KeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Grissom v. MoranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.