Triest & Co. v. Goldstone
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. D. Freidenrich, and Henry G. W. Dinkelspiel, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The case comes to this court by virtue of an order of transfer, after judgment by the district court of appeal for the first appellate district. The court of appeal, speaking through Mr. Justice Kerrigan, delivered an opinion which reads as follows:
‘‘This is an appeal from a judgment in an action to recover rent alleged to be due according to the terms of a certain lease, judgment went for the defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
“On July 8,1907, a lease was entered into between plaintiffs as lessors, and Goldstone Bros., a corporation, as lessee, of the basement, ground floor and first floor of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Brosnan v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Fry v. PatridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Abrahamson v. BrettOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Buchanan v. BantaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Rognier v. HarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Steel v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- In re MunsieDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.