Legal Opinion

Meurer v. Brinkman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to strike out an answer as sham.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

The action is upon two promissory notes by the rpayee against the maker. The answer denies the allegation of the 'complaint that the notes were made and delivered for value. This ■denial raises the issue of want of consideration, it not being necessary to plead lack of consideration as a “ defence ” (Evans v. Williams, 60 Barb. 346). • The motion is upon affidavits to strike the answer out as sham (Code Civ. Pro. sec. 538)., A general or *13special denial cannot be struck out as sham. Only “ defences ” may be struck out as sham (Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281). Ho issue raised by a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wayland v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Flack v. O'BrienNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Evans v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Green v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  5. von Hagen v. Waterbury Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Mitnacht v. HawthorneNew York Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API